Online Data Conflict With Desire for Privacy
Some Fear Misuse of Personal Information That Is Readily Accessed on
Internet
By May Wong
Associated Press
Friday, December 26, 2003;
Page A15
Serial killer Maury Travis used an online mapping service to show a newspaper
reporter where he dumped a body. A former Las Vegas exotic dancer convicted of
stalking and harassing her ex-lover posted a map on the Web with directions to
the married man's home. Internet mapping services are powerful and simple: Type a phone number into
Google or other sites for a map with door-to-door directions. Finding someone
has never been easier. Now those resources are provoking a backlash. Spooked people worried about
stalkers or worse are striking their particulars from phone and Internet
listings. Count Sonjia Kenya, 30, among them. She is no stranger to the Internet but
was stunned recently to learn how easy it is to go online and get directions to
her front door. All it takes is her phone number. "I was appalled and petrified as a single woman living in New York," Kenya
said. She vows never again to give her phone number to potential suitors. Many home addresses are attainable through a variety of public records and
telephone listings. As well, reverse directories that let someone look up an
address by phone number have been available at libraries or for sale
commercially for years. But many Internet sites that gather that kind of data now make it possible
for fast, do-it-yourself desktop sleuthing, some for free and some for a
fee. Search engine provider Google Inc. added a phone number-map lookup feature
more than two years ago. Other sites include FindPeople.com, WhitePages.com and Switchboard.com. If
the sites do not have a direct link to a map, users can go to such free sites as
Yahoo! Maps, MapQuest or Microsoft Corp.'s MapPoint. Tens of millions of people
use those mapping services each month to help them find places. Navigation Technologies Corp., which supplies the digital roadmaps used by
those Web sites, has seen revenue more than double in three years, to $165.8
million in 2002. It is expected to top $200 million this year. The Internet features are convenient tools for everyone, whether to look up a
long-lost friend or relative -- or to aid someone with malicious intent. Earlier this month, Steven Sutcliffe of Manchester, N.H., who had been fired
by Global Crossing Ltd., was convicted of identity theft and use of the Internet
to threaten company executives. He had created a Web site that included
employees' Social Security numbers and maps to some of their homes. Sutcliffe,
who represented himself during the final weeks of trial, told the jury he "was
just publishing information." An animal rights group, Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty, has posted on its Web
site point-and-click map listings, including the home addresses of executives
and affiliates of England's Huntingdon Life Sciences Ltd. The tactic is legal
under free-speech laws but has coincided with a rise in protests outside the
homes of people connected to Huntingdon, prompting dozens of firms to sever
their ties with the research lab. By all accounts, however, the popularity of Internet maps has more to do with
benefits than sinister uses. Online maps and driving directions have become a must-have for business Web
sites as more consumers treat the Internet as an information appliance, said Lee
Rainie, director of the Pew Internet and American Life Project. "For a lot of people now, especially those with broadband connections, the
first place they go to for information is online," Rainie said. "But people are
still warming up to the idea that lots of information about them is online." In a 2002 survey, Pew found that one in four Internet users have typed their
own names into a search engine to see what information about them is on the Web.
And a quarter of those people were surprised by how much data about them was
online, Rainie said. People who want to make their phone and address data less accessible on
Internet directories should ask their local phone company to keep their
information out of both local phone book and 411 directory assistance. But doing so does not guarantee erasure across the Internet because databases
cull other public records, too. Privacy concerns have led a small number of people to request removal from
the Google phone number-mapping feature, said Google spokesman David Krane. He
would not say how many have done so. After Kenya received an e-mail alerting her to the feature, she immediately
filled out the Google form to remove her listing. But then she used the same
tool and other online features to check on a man who had asked her out. "I'm upset that it intrudes my privacy," Kenya said. "But at the same time,
I'm trying to get as much information as I can from the Internet."